Those who Disagree with me are Evil or Insane

The libtards are at it again.

Tory scum are to blame.

Remoaners are pathetic.

All Tories are fascists.

Liblabcon got us into this mess.

Thatcher was a Nazi.

Aren’t you fed up with all that meaningless abuse? Perhaps not. The trouble is that an awful lot of my “friends” indulge in it. We all agree that those nasty people who send death threats to decent Great Ormond Street Hospital doctors and nurses are beyond the pale. But do we also agree that the use of foul abuse directed at those who hold different political opinions from us is reprehensible?

Well, I do. But my impression is that I am almost alone in being so weedy.

What is meant by “libtard”, a word which appears in countless social media comments written by those on the right to describe people whose opinions are different from theirs? I think I have worked it out. It means that anyone with a liberal approach to politics is mentally retarded. It is used as a sort of shorthand to avoid actually tackling the arguments of those at whom it is directed.

“Tory scum” is easy enough to understand. It just means that anyone who adheres to the Conservative Party is the scum of the earth. As with libtard, it is used in order to avoid rational argument.

“Remoaners” is probably a little (tiny bit) more subtle. Remoaners are people who regret the Brexit referendum result, but can’t accept that it has happened. Yet again, it is a term of abuse which is used in place of actual argument.

It has long been the practice of some on the left in politics to accuse those on the right of being “fascists”. It is a term used particularly, and therefore rather oddly, to describe libertarians. Once again (are we beginning to detect a theme?) it is employed with the aim of avoiding debate.

“Liblabcon” is a bit of a favourite of mine. It is a term employed by members of the UK Independence Party to demonstrate that anyone who supports any party other than Ukip is guilty of confidence tricks. Yes, how tedious, it is used to avoid debate.

Finally, there is the inevitable accusation that Margaret Thatcher was a “Nazi”. This is one which will run and run. Lady Thatcher is a demon figure in left wing mythology. The left reckon that she is still admired by some Conservatives (obviously not by Mrs May) and they find it convenient to dismiss her as a modern Hitler so as, yet again, to avoid a real argument with those sad specimens who still approve of her.

The internet has brought us many advantages. It is a wonderful thing. But it does seem to have encouraged an awful lot of nonsense and a fair amount of plain beastliness. It strikes me as being decidedly odd that this device, which ought to encourage debate, has closed it down.

I don’t really know about Twitter (it is too complicated for me), but I see Face Book. And what I see, apart from lots of holiday pics, are masses of furious posts, containing no rational argument at all, accusing others of evil or insanity. I am, I suspect, unusual in that I have Face Book friends of pretty well every political persuasion. I can therefore peek into their group think sessions. And what I see are all those silly abusive terms, with no sane argument at all.

When, in the olden days, we conducted political debate face to face, in pubs, at supper parties, over lunch etc., we knew we had to present a rational case if we had any hope of winning the argument. Now, we (or you, I should say), restrict our (your) audiences to those who will agree with us (you). And what could be easier than just hurling abuse at our (your) opponents?

Oh well, we are stuck with this new approach to “debate”. We must just put up with it.

Charles

Advertisements

4 thoughts on “Those who Disagree with me are Evil or Insane

  1. We all need to accept, hard as it is, that not everyone will agree with us. But I like the word Remoaner, a neat coining that fills a need. You have to admit that many remainers have worked long and unremittingly to earn that description.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. I wish just once, Charles, I could disagree, but in this instance I cannot. You obviously must try harder.

    If you do, I will, of course, just politely agree to disagree.

    No, we should not put up with it, I hate these labels and should I ever resort to this sort of nonsense, please feel free to tell me!

    I am beginning to hate social media, but I cannot say I ever been a fan.

    Like

  3. Charles

    LibLabCon, to write it correctly, is a term meant to convey the UKIP’s and other disenchanted voters’ opinion that there is no practical difference between the politics of the other three main parties and consequently whichever one votes for the results will be the same.

    Nigel Farage famously said you couldn’t get a cigarette paper between the three of them. So ‘Con’ in this context meant ‘Conservative’ and not a confidence trickster, though Nigel (and I) would heartily agree that pejorative applies equally to all three.

    Liked by 1 person

Add your comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s