The Art of Public Speaking

It is mean of me to single out Mrs May. Very few modern politicians are good at oratory. The Prime Minister is very far from being alone. But, inevitably, because prime ministers’ speeches tend to be rather more important than those of other politicians, Mrs May’s efforts at public speaking are more noticeable than those of others.

The two recent terrorist atrocities (Westminster and Manchester) led, quite rightly, to Mrs May making emotional speeches to the nation from Downing Street. In both cases, her words were well judged. She said what had to be said by our head of government. I stress that I make no criticism of the content of her speeches. But I do have to say that her delivery was simply appalling.

Winston Churchill’s wartime speeches were often extremely emotional in content, but they were always delivered in what one might call a matter of fact tone. There was nothing of the ham amateur actor in Churchill’s delivery. The drama was to be found in the words, not in the way they were spoken. As I wrote that last sentence I realised there was something wrong in it. It was, in fact, the combination of the words and the totally undramatic way in which they were spoken which made his speeches so successful. Mrs May, on the other hand (along with most of her colleagues in the House of Commons) thinks there must be drama in the delivery as well as in the content. Her voice quivers, like that of the worst amateur actress, as she expresses the resolution of the British people to defeat these vile terrorists. She goes in for dramatic pauses. In fact, she uses every trick of the third rate actor in order, she assumes, to convince us that she passionately believes every word she is speaking.

Just listen to Churchill speaking four words. “We shall never surrender”. Now imagine Mrs May saying them. I suspect you will see my point. Churchill knew that his four words would strike a chord in his listeners. To speak them in the manner preferred by the juvenile lead in the village drama club would rob them of their meaning. But Mrs May and, as I keep stressing, most other modern politicians, thinks the words are not enough: they have to be delivered with high drama.

And then her listeners just cringe in embarrassment.

This is a problem which can very easily be overcome. And it certainly ought to be easy for a vicar’s daughter to overcome it (no self respecting vicar, when proclaiming the Gospel, would ever dream of trying to improve the words of the evangelists by indulging in cheap dramatic tricks).

Some will say that I am fighting a lost cause, that the decline in standards of public speaking is inevitable now that politicians no longer address meetings in town halls or stand on soap boxes in market squares. But I disagree, especially in the case of prime ministers. It has become commonplace for prime ministers (I assume they are imitating American presidents) to stride out of Number Ten and stand at a lectern in order to address the nation. If that’s what they want to do I really don’t see why they should not bother to do it well.

Charles

Advertisements

6 thoughts on “The Art of Public Speaking

  1. Charles,

    You are quite right on the point you choose to make. These politicians love the opportunity to appear solemn and serious and a good crisis should never go to waste.

    You choose not to criticise the content of May’s speech, but isn’t the content more important than the delivery? Are you not, by definition, worrying about surface matters?

    As I point out, to describe an act of mass murder and self slaughter as ‘cowardice’ is to suggests the person hasn’t thought for long before speaking, and if so, to what extent does the person care?

    These stock responses from our ‘leaders’ are mildly terrifying because, whatever delivery style is used, there’s nothing behind the words.

    Nobody who cared would talk in the banal, uniform way these robots do.

    Like

  2. When she says things like ‘together we will defeat terrorism’ does she mean tea lights and flowers and roadside shrines?

    Can we hug these vile people to death? Or if that sounds too strong, hug them to a new understanding of multicultural diversity?

    Liked by 1 person

  3. I have noticed that Mrs May nods periodically during her speeches for emphasis: sometimes the nods are so vigorous as to involve her upper body. My only criticism is that the nods bear little correspondence with the content of the speech and where the emphasis should naturally fall. The nods just come at random intervals.

    Like

Add your comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s