The Government Must Stop Banging on about “Fundamental British Values”

Like a tin pot totalitarian regime, our present government has got it into its collective head that we should legislate against people who don’t support various fundamental British values. The aim is to allow the civil courts to ban people from expressing opinions which are disagreeable to our rulers. Of course, those who rashly think they have a right to free expression and ignore these banning orders will be sent to prison (most MPs love the idea of imprisoning their fellow countrymen and are deeply distressed that we don’t yet send more people to prison than any other country – though we’re getting there).

To be fair, despite having promised to publish its new Counter-Terrorism and Safeguarding Bill to ban free speech for the last two years, the government has still not done so. My guess is that the poor civil servants are finding it impossible to agree a form of words which will not produce chaos in our courts.

Let us first consider the alleged mischief at which this horribly un-British measure is aimed. As I understand it, the government thinks that it is not enough to stop people from inciting violence in support of their political aims. We should step in earlier and stop people from peacefully advocating various changes in the law or expressing disapproval of opinions deemed by Mrs May (yes – this is another of her Home Office initiatives) to be fundamental to our British way of life.

This is the closest we have yet got to the government’s notion of what the Bill should do: the law should ban “the vocal or active opposition to our fundamental values, including democracy, the rule of law, individual liberty and the mutual respect and tolerance of different faiths and beliefs.”

There are many quite respectable people who think universal suffrage a very bad idea. I understand their point of view. I would definitely have shared it in 1832. Obviously, they have no chance of persuading Parliament to abandon democracy. But why should the courts ban them from expressing their opinions? I have many dear friends who are convinced that it was quite wrong to allow the working classes to vote in the recent Brexit referendum. Why shouldn’t they be allowed to make their complaints? The rest of us can answer their arguments. There is no need to use the law to ban them from expressing their opinions.

I happen to be very keen on the rule of law. But, especially these days, there are many who disagree. They think we should have government by official edict rather than what the rest of us understand by “law”. And there are even people out there who attack judges for alleged political bias. They don’t advocate violence against the poor judges, they just express their opinion that judges are too left-wing or too right-wing. Should they all be clapped in irons?

The individual liberty part of these fundamental values could lead to hilarious results. On the present wording, Mrs May herself could be in trouble with the law for her efforts to stifle free speech.

But it is, of course, religion which presents the major problems. There are still lots of protestants who consider that Catholics are evil, that they have deliberately misunderstood God’s true message. They get frightfully worked up about such papist theories as that which says that salvation can come through good works. The thought of “Maryolatry” drives them into paroxysms of rage. They will never respect and tolerate Catholics and why should they? They honestly think that people like me (I confess to being a Catholic) are a thoroughly malign influence.

And there are some Catholics, also, whose dislike of other Christian churches, and even some members of their own, is intense (try suggesting to a priest of the London Oratory Church that it is not a mortal sin to receive Communion on the hand rather than the tongue and you will see what I mean).

And all this before we get on to Muslims.There are some Muslims, actually many of them, who advocate the punishment of homosexuals. I disagree, strongly, with them. Am I to be banned from expressing my disapproval because I am not respecting or tolerating their religion?

I have done a bit of research. I can find no one, other than Mrs May and, presumably, Ms Rudd, who supports this proposed attack on what one might call British values. Newspapers on the left and on the right and a Parliamentary Select Committee are all agreed both that there is no need for the Counter-Terrorism and Safeguarding Bill and that it is likely, if ever published, to be deeply illiberal. That doesn’t mean, of course, that MPs won’t dutifully file into the voting lobby to support it (especially if it will increase the prison population).

Is there any hope that Mrs May will quietly accept that this policy was misjudged and should be dropped? I earnestly hope so, but I also have to acknowledge that the Prime Minister appears to be wholly incapable of ever accepting that anything she proposed while in the Home Office might not be the best thing since sliced bread.


9 thoughts on “The Government Must Stop Banging on about “Fundamental British Values”

  1. Good morning Charles. Your reference to religious intolerance was a tad anachronistic. I know of nobody, Protestant or Catholic, who is strongly opposed to the other. Indeed, the vast majority of the population don’t give a damn.
    It took you time with this strange diversion (I realise you wished to appear even-handed), to get to the real issue, which is Islam. We tolerate them, but they do not tolerate us – except of course, when they are enjoying free healthcare, unemployment benefits and the affections of liberals. Their rejection of the gay community and their unpleasant attitude to women is deplorable.
    If May proceeds with this pseudo-legal twaddle, she will find she has driven the ordinary Brit to breaking-point. I’m not suggesting, yet, that the gutters will run with blood, but I anticipate a huge surge of civil disobedience.
    With Brexit to deal with, the new POTUS, the MENA trash and our increasingly communistic unions, I would have thought she had better things to do.


    • But my point, Adextra, was that the extraordinarily vague wording proposed by the government would lead to ludicrous results of the type which I described. True, there aren’t many extreme protestants these days, but there are, I can assure you, some. Northern Ireland is not the only place in the United Kingdom in which the Pope is sometimes referred to as the antichrist. Some may say that such “extremism” should not be allowed. I because I favour freedom of expression except in cases of incitement to violence, do not agree.

      It is certainly the case that Mrs May’s real targets are what the government calls “conservative” Muslims, those who do not actually advocate or incite violence but who do not respect and are not tolerant of other religions. I do not like or approve of what such people say, but I doubt whether it can really be right to use the law to prevent them from declaring their honestly held opinions, unless, of course, they take things further and try to incite violence. Anyway, the government clearly doesn’t believe it can single out Islamic conservatism without also banning Christian conservatism.

      I quite agree that the Prime Minister has better things to do with her time.



  2. Hello Charles you raise some interesting points. I have had a number of friends of various Faith’s in the 80s I had to Muslim friends and I was surprised at their view of their own religion which suggested to me that it would not be a terribly bright idea for their imams to come over here. This has prompted me to look at their religion over the past few years and I am minded to think that some of the more fundamental ideas that they share would represent a difficulty in a modern Western democracy


Add your comment

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s