Is Death the End?

That is a question which is usually posed by those who long to know whether Christians are right in believing that eternal life will follow the end of life in this world. But, as the desperately sad case of JS, the fourteen year old girl who has died of cancer and been cryonically preserved, shows, there are many people for whom the question means something entirely different.

I make no criticism of poor JS. She was only fourteen. I can see that some teenagers might well be taken with the idea of being frozen after death and then brought back to life in two or three hundred years when cures for their terminal diseases have been found and a way of re-animating frozen dead bodies has been invented. But the idea strikes me as being the stuff of nightmares. Let us suppose, a very generous supposition, that the thawing, re-animating and curing all work perfectly in 2216 or thereabouts. JS wakes up in a world which will be quite unrecognisable to her. All her family and friends will have died over a hundred years earlier. Is she really going to enjoy this new life?

The reality, of course, is that, if the resurrecting of cryonically preserved bodies is in fact ever attempted, it will go disastrously wrong. If some form of life is achieved, it will almost certainly be far from perfect. The science is highly speculative. No one can really say whether vital organs, particularly the brain, can survive death and long-term freezing. The probability must be that they cannot. All attempts to freeze organs for transplant have failed: is it really possible that freezing whole bodies will work? We can only guess at the extent of disability which these resurrected bodies will suffer, but the likelihood must be that it will be great.

But, as I say, I can just about understand why a teenager might be tempted by cryonic preservation. What completely baffles me is why men and women who have already passed their three score years and ten should see any attraction in it at all. And yet the articles which have appeared on the subject since JS hit the headlines reveal that a great many of those who have signed up to cryonic preservation when they die are already in their seventies and eighties.

I suppose some of these elderly fans of cryonic preservation may have early dementia. That could explain their eagerness to be frozen and brought back to life in a few hundred years’ time. But many of them, in other respects, give every appearance of sanity. What is it that they want? Do they really want to come back to life as elderly men and women in a world which will be wholly different from the one in which they died? Are they expecting that old age will have been abolished, that they, and everyone else in this new world, will live for ever? Has it not occurred to them that a world in which everyone lives for ever may be insufferable, that it will be grossly overpopulated, that the only solution to the population crisis will be laws banning child birth leaving no one, eventually, under the age of about 150? No, they can’t really be sane.

Maybe you think that all this can be dismissed as the ravings of a foolish Christian who has been brainwashed into thinking Christ’s promise of eternal life in another place will be a reality. Yes, I do believe that, but I am not immune from doubt. And in those moments of doubt I have never once thought that, if there is no life after death, I would like to live for ever in this world. Neither can I understand why any sane person could have such a wish.

Still, there’s nowt so queer as folk and, if others would prefer to devote their life’s savings to freezing their dead bodies rather than helping their surviving dependants, it is no business of mine.



6 thoughts on “Is Death the End?

    • Not a great deal. Though, funnily enough, I did read a novel, a few years ago, all about cryonic preservation. It was gloriously silly.



  1. I think people are terrified of their mortality. It’s the one thing that’s inevitable, well, except for taxes unless one can afford good enough legal help. People fear what they can’t control. I’m not afraid of death or of dying. I’ve had good times and bad, success and failures. I’m on balance happy with the life I’ve had and accept whatever happens.


  2. Charles, dear heart, you find 2016 quite disconcerting enough. No doubt 2216 would be utterly deplorable.

    I think curiosity is one reason to hope it might be possible. What will life be like in one, two, or three centuries time? To have the possibility of that answer must be intriguing. Of course, one would have to be an optimist about the future to want to see the world then, but I can see the attraction for some.

    In the case of a young, or younger person, a powerful incentive must be a sense of not having done enough living: of ambitions unmet and experiences not had. For an aged person who has led a good life that incentive is much less.

    On the other hand, if the centre of one’s life is friends and family then the prospect of a future life where they are gone might be appalling. Yet that is not the centre of life for all and if one is more self-contained, more of a light-traveller through life, then the prospect of more travelling in a strange new world might be appealing.

    I’m ambivalent but have no plans to be frozen after death.

    Life after death is, for an atheist, a non-thing. However, I am partial to an idea I discovered while researching various cultural ideas of the nature of the human soul for my novel and one I liked is the idea that part of our soul lives on after death in the form of the memories we leave behind among the living.


Add your comment

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s